A shock assault against the capital city in the dead of night, culminating in the capture of the nation's leader. By the next morning, the intervening power declares its intention to govern for an indefinite period.
That is precisely how Russia's president imagined his large-scale offensive of Ukraine playing out in early 2022. Instead, it was Donald Trump who pulled it off in Venezuela, in a operation labeled illegal internationally, spiriting away the Kremlin's historic ally NicolĂĄs Maduro, who now faces trial in New York.
In public, Russian officials have reacted with anger, condemning the attack as a blatant breach of global norms and a dangerous precedent. Yet beyond the official statements, there is a feeling of grudging respect â and even envy â at the effectiveness of a power grab that Russia once imagined, but could not carry out due to a series of intelligence blunders and Ukraine's strong resistance.
âThe operation was carried out with precision,â wrote the pro-Kremlin Telegram channel a popular military blog. âMost likely, this is exactly how our 'special military operation' was supposed to proceed: fast, dramatic and decisive. Itâs difficult to imagine Russia's top general expected to be engaged in combat for four years.â
Such commentary have fueled a atmosphere of soul-searching among pro-war voices, with some openly questioning how Russia's promised blitzkrieg in Ukraine morphed into a protracted and deadly conflict.
Olga Uskova, said she felt âembarrassmentâ on Russia's behalf given how brazen the US intervention seemed. âWithin 24 hours, Trump arrested Maduro and seemingly wrapped up his own 'military mission,ââ she wrote.
For over twenty years, Venezuela sought to cultivate a network of anti-American allies â from Russia and China to Havana and Tehran â in the hope of helping to shape a alternative bloc capable of standing up to Washington.
Yet despite Russia's foreign minister vowing backing for the Caracas government just in late December, few serious analysts ever expected Moscow would intervene meaningfully.
Mired in Ukraine, Russia has, recently, watched other important partners fall from power or weaken sharply â from Bashar al-Assad to an increasingly weakened Iran â laying bare the constraints of the Kremlin's reach.
âFor Russia, the situation is profoundly awkward,â said a foreign policy analyst. âVenezuela is a key ally and ideological ally, and Maduro and Putin have longstanding ties, leaving Moscow with little choice but to express outrage. But offering any tangible support to a country so far away is simply not feasible â for technical and logistical reasons.â
There is also a more practical calculation. The Kremlin's main focus, experts note, is Ukraine â and keeping a good relationship with Trump on that issue greatly exceeds the fate of Caracas.
âPutin and Trump are presently engaged with a far more consequential issue for Moscow: Ukraine. And for all the Kremlin's goodwill towards Caracas, it is unlikely to upend a broader geopolitical contest with a critical partner over what it sees as a secondary concern,â the analyst concluded.
Still, Russia's diminished role in Venezuela carries multiple concrete consequences for Moscow. If a US-friendly government takes power in Caracas, American military specialists could gain access to large parts of the Venezuelan armed forces' arsenal, including sophisticated weaponry supplied by Russia.
Those include S-300VM air-defence systems delivered in 2013, as well as an undisclosed number of Pantsir and Buk-M2 systems transferred in late 2025.
Moscow has also provided billions in loans to Venezuela, much of which it is now probably lost forever.
A greater immediate worry for Moscow, however, is crude oil: American control over Venezuela's vast reserves could depress international oil prices, threatening one of Russia's key revenue streams.
âIf our American 'friends' gain access to Venezuelaâs oilfields, more than half of the worldâs oil reserves will end up under their control,â wrote a prominent Russian billionaire. âAnd it appears their plan will be to ensure that the price of our oil does not rise above $50 a barrel.â
Still, some in Moscow perceive a bleak kind of optimism. Trump's kidnapping of Maduro, they contend, could deal a final blow to the rules-based international order and pave the way for a more nakedly power-based world order â one where power, rather than law, shapes outcomes.
âThe US administration is ruthless and pragmatic in pursuing its country's interests,â wrote Dmitry Medvedev with endorsement. âRemoving Maduro had nothing to do with drugs â only oil, and they freely acknowledge it. The law of the strongest is clearly more powerful than ordinary justice.â